Alberta
Submissions
Canadian Bankers Association

Pre-Budget submission: Building on Alberta’s strengths for a prosperous future

Summary Points

Article

The CBA appreciates the opportunity to help shape Alberta’s future by contributing to the Treasury Board and Finance’s consultation for the upcoming Budget. Representing more than 60 domestic and foreign banks, we advocate for public policies that support a sound and secure banking system, while fostering economic growth and prosperity for all Canadians. We are pleased to provide these recommendations on behalf of our members.

Recommendation 1: Support the federal government’s electoral commitment to conduct a comprehensive review of the corporate tax system. The review should aim to improve nationwide productivity, job creation, and Canada’s economy by:

  • Ensuring the tax system is anchored on the principles of tax efficiency, neutrality, certainty, and competitiveness
  • Encouraging the federal government to end sector‑specific tax measures by reinstating the Dividend Received Deduction (DRD) for financial institutions and phasing out the Financial Institutions (FI) Tax
  • Prohibiting the use of retroactive taxation that creates uncertainty for businesses and investors
  • Publicly support lowering Canada’s statutory and effective corporate tax rates, and the combined rate for investors, to rank within the lowest third in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) by 2030 and annually track progress against that objective to encourage international and domestic investment

Recommendation 2: The Government of Alberta continue to align the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) to federal privacy legislation and private sector definitions and concepts as it proceeds with its privacy reform efforts. Given the importance of harmonization and interoperability of privacy laws to consumers and businesses, we recommend harmonizing Alberta’s private sector privacy provisions with other Canadian jurisdictions’ private sector privacy laws. It is also important that provincial privacy legislation support other important consumer‑based public policy objectives, such as Consumer‑Driven Banking and efforts to combat financial crimes (including protecting confidentiality of files under investigation and supporting information sharing for financial crime prevention).

Recommendation 3: Support the creation of a national financial regulation framework for un- or under‑regulated payments service providers (such as e-commerce platforms and similar entities) rooted in the strong system that presently governs banks. We further encourage the Government of Alberta to work with the federal and other provincial governments to establish a nationwide market conduct framework that provides consistent protections to all Canadians regardless of location.

Recommendation 4: Ensure the National Anti‑Fraud strategy addresses key requirements to combat financial crimes provincially and federally, including adequate resources to hold criminals accountable under the Criminal Code of Canada. Specifically, the CBA supports the following measures:

  • Centralizing financial crimes reporting flows between the Canadian Anti‑Fraud Centre (CAFC) and Alberta police agencies to better provide line of sight to authorities to track and mitigate these crimes
  • Ensuring sufficient training, funding, and dedicated resources for law enforcement and prosecutors to respond to the rising volume and sophistication of financial crime
  • Expanding public education initiatives to equip Canadians with the knowledge and tools they need to protect themselves against financial crime and scams Taking a multi‑sector approach to combatting scams, including coordinating with telecommunications and online platforms
  • Replicating successful models such as Ontario's Serious Fraud Office in Alberta to improve coordination and enforcement

Recommendation 5: Collaborate with the federal government to strengthen Canada’s commitment to corporate beneficial ownership transparency, in addition to investment in relevant authorities to support money laundering (ML) and terrorist financing (TF) investigations. In particular, we urge investments in Alberta’s enforcement and prosecution capacity and harmonize its existing tools with federal measures. A harmonized approach will ensure effectiveness by avoiding legislative arbitrage and reduce compliance duplication across jurisdictions.

Recommendation 6: Collaborate with the federal government by having the Alberta Securities Commission (ASC) coordinate with self‑regulatory organizations such as the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) to:

  • Support harmonized regulations across all institutions offering investment and registered accounts
  • Modernize account transfer infrastructure
  • Establish standardized procedures and timelines

Recommendation 7: Provide policy and regulatory support to help provincially regulated credit unions that choose to transition to the federal credit union framework. Similar support should be provided for amalgamations and asset transactions between federal and provincial credit unions, increase financial transparency in the provincial credit union system, and align the provincial credit unions’ unlimited deposit guarantees to international and national best practices.

Recommendation 8: Strengthen public safety and community well‑being by:

  • Introducing legislation or industry regulations to phase out the use of universal master keys in heavy construction equipment and implementing a regular PIN management regiment
  • Facilitating information sharing of construction site locations with various stakeholders to allow ATM operators to implement risk‑based security measures
  • Implementing innovative and comprehensive solutions that address public safety challenges, while improving community vitality and economic growth
  • Urgently increasing funding for community vibrancy projects, addiction recovery services, and expanded police and crisis teams
  • Enhancing community services for unhoused individuals, recognizing that this continues to be a significant challenge
  • Launching local coalition efforts to revitalize heavily impacted cities and regions
  • Providing a comprehensive listing of all mobile response teams (MRTs) operating across the province

Introduction

Beyond serving as a cornerstone of Canada’s strong and stable financial system, banks actively partner with Canadians to help them achieve their goals, whether purchasing a home, starting a business, saving for the future, or navigating periods of financial uncertainty.

Banks played a vital role in Alberta’s prosperity by:1

  • Contributing approximately $8.9 billion (about 2.5%) of GDP to Alberta’s economy
  • Paying close to $300 million in taxes to provincial and municipal government in Alberta and generating more than $29 billion in dividend income for Canadian seniors, families, pensions, charities, and endowments
  • Employing more than 18,700 people in Alberta in an inclusive and equitable workforce, with women representing about 62% and self-identified visible minorities comprising about 41%

Banks helped Albertans:

  • Purchase homes, with more than $170 billion in residential mortgages outstanding2
  • Start and grow businesses, with more than $33 billion in credit authorized for small and medium-sized enterprises and authorized close to $240 billion in total business credit3
  • Facilitate access to financing, approving close to 9 in 10 small business debt financing requests annually since 20104

An increasingly competitive and evolving financial services landscape

Alberta’s financial services sector is highly competitive. Six domestic systemically important banks (DSIBs) compete with 72 federally regulated domestic and foreign small- and medium‑sized banks (SMSBs) and credit unions for deposits across Alberta. This competition is further intensified by 12 provincially regulated credit unions and ATB Financial.5 Financial institutions recognize the vital role physical branch locations play in ensuring access to essential and specialized banking services, building relationships, and supporting local economies. Collectively, they operate nearly 1,100 branches across the province, with banks operating nearly 60 percent and their competitors the remainder.6

Competition is equally strong in the mortgage market. Nearly 30 banks compete with more than 45 non‑bank financial institutions (including provincial credit unions, mortgage finance companies, trust companies, and insurance companies) under the National Housing Act (NHA).7 Private lenders and investment firms further expand the competitor landscape.

Furthermore, the financial sector is evolving, as new technology and service providers enter the competitive landscape. Examples of these new entrants include large technology platforms with growing access to consumer data and fintech payment services providers, buy‑now‑pay‑later companies, digital currency exchanges, and robo‑advisors. More broadly, close to 5,100 fintechs and technological giants are offering or embedding financial services into their platforms further fragmenting the financial marketplace.8 Adoption of digital‑first banking is widespread with 84 percent of financial transactions and 95 per cent of retail spending occurring digitally.9 These new rivals leverage telecommunications network and payments systems to compete without a physical presence and many consumers have become comfortable with digital‑only financial solutions.

In response, Canada’s major banks have invested approximately $120 billion in technology over the past decade to enhance consumer experience, reduce costs, and maintain competitiveness.10 These strategic investments have contributed to labour productivity growth in the Finance and Insurance sector of 2.4 percent annually since 2007, the second fastest rate among all Canadian industries.11 Regulators are also advancing initiatives such as consumer‑driven banking and real‑time rail payments to further encourage innovation and consumer choice.

Canadians are benefiting from the increased competition and innovation in the financial sector. Average credit card interchange fees for retailers fell from 1.7 percent in 2014 to 1.4 percent in 2020, saving merchants an estimated $2.5 billion. Small business interchange fees fell even further, reaching 0.95 percent in 2024. Investment costs have also decreased: mutual fund management expense ratios (MERs) declined to 1.47 percent in 2023 from 2.06 percent in 2013. With the emergence of ultra‑low‑cost exchange‑traded funds, the average MER declined further to 1.28 percent.12

The financial sector is also influenced by regulatory initiatives that focus on consumer protection and market stability (e.g., AML, privacy rules, cybersecurity). Canadian banks have been complying with these public policy initiatives while providing competitive services and maintaining some of the highest levels of consumer trust among developed countries (Graph 1).

Graph 1 is a bar chart showing trust in Canada’s banks ranked against trust in banks in other selected OECD countries. Trust in Canada’s banks is at the same level as those in Netherlands and higher compared to banks in U.S., U.K., Ireland, Australia, Germany, France, Japan, Sweden, Italy, and Spain

Recommendation 1: Reform the tax system to work for Canadians

Canadians’ standard of living, as measured by real GDP per person, was lower in 2024 than in 2014. Canada risks continued deterioration in living standards without improvement to its low labour productivity, ultimately resulting in wage stagnation, constraints to governments’ public services, increased production costs, and reduced competitiveness globally.

Canada’s productivity has declined significantly over time, falling from sixth place among Organisation for Economic Co‑operation and Development (OECD) countries in 1970 to 18th in 2022 and ranks second last among G7 countries.13 In relation to our largest trading partner, productivity in Canada is approximately 30 percent lower than in the U.S., comparable to levels seen in lower‑income states rather than in innovation leaders like California or New York.14

Furthermore, since the last comprehensive review nearly 60 years ago, Canada’s tax system has evolved without a consistent focus on foundational tax policy principles that underpin domestic and foreign investment, economic growth, and innovation. The International Monetary Fund (IMF), the OECD, and others have urged Canada to implement growth‑oriented tax policies. This is unsurprising given Canada’s loss of its business tax advantage internationally: it now ranks 27th of 38 OECD countries in corporate tax rates and has the third highest combined corporate and personal tax rates in the OECD.15

Targeted taxes on the financial services sector have further undermined economic growth and productivity by limiting banks’ capital available for Canadian businesses, reducing Canadians’ ability to save and invest, and dampening foreign investment. Other countries recognize the negative effects of sector‑specific taxes with Australia’s Government Productivity Commission concluding that industry levies must be avoided to establish or maintain sound foundations for productivity growth.16

Canada’s targeted taxes include:

  • Removal of the Dividend Received Deduction, impacting over 3 million Canadians holding market‑linked GICs and notes, often middle‑class households close to retirement who seek stable returns and downside protection
  • The 2022 Financial Institutions (FI) Tax and the Canada Recovery Dividend (CRD) curtailed credit capacity to businesses and consumers as every dollar reduction in retained earnings translates into over $7.50 of foregone new credit capacity. These taxes also led to a divestment of $11.6 billion in Canadian bank equity by foreign investors in 2023
  • Retroactive sales taxes on payment clearing services undermine the tax system’s principles of predictability, certainty, fairness, and investor confidence

Canada’s persistent productivity challenges, combined with heightened uncertainty arising from trade and tax policies in the U.S., underscore the need for comprehensive tax reform more than ever. Strengthening Canada’s resilience to external economic shocks will require a tax system that is modern, efficient, and competitive. We were encouraged by the Prime Minister’s campaign promise, which included a commitment to review Canada’s corporate tax system, guided by the principles of fairness, transparency, simplicity, sustainability, and competitiveness and encourage provinces to support such a review.

Recommendation: Support the federal government’s electoral commitment to conduct a comprehensive review of the corporate tax system. The review should aim to improve nationwide productivity, job creation, and the economy by:

  • Ensuring the tax system is anchored on the principles of tax efficiency, neutrality, certainty, and competitiveness
  • Encouraging the federal government to end sector‑specific tax measures by reinstating the Dividend Received Deduction for financial institutions and phasing out the Financial Institutions Tax
  • Prohibiting the use of retroactive taxation that creates uncertainty for businesses and investors
  • Publicly support lowering Canada’s statutory and effective corporate tax rates, and the combined rate for investors, to rank within the lowest third in the OECD by 2030 and annually track progress against that objective to encourage international and domestic investment

Recommendation 2: Importance of harmonized and interoperable privacy laws nationwide

The federal government has signaled its intention to introduce federal privacy legislation soon. In light of this, we recommend that the Alberta Government monitor any new federal privacy proposals and take steps to ensure that Alberta’s Personal Information and Protection Act (PIPA) remain substantially similar to the federal privacy law. Alignment of definitions and requirements is essential to ensure consistent obligations, clear privacy rights, and streamlined compliance that benefits both consumers and businesses.

For Albertans, harmonization and interoperability of privacy laws would provide a familiar and consistent experience, regardless of residency or whether individuals transact with a bank or its subsidiaries. For Alberta businesses, harmonization facilitates cross-border operations, simplifies compliance, supports delivery of consistent products and services nationwide, and streamlines enforcement and consumer complaint regimes. These outcomes increase consumer choice and access to innovative products and services, while effectively and efficiently protecting consumers’ privacy rights. Conversely, inconsistent private sector privacy requirements risk higher compliance costs and barriers to innovation.

It is important to maintain a principles-based, technology‑neutral, and proportionate approach to privacy laws that protect individuals from harm while supporting innovation and economic growth. By focusing on practical, harm‑based solutions and leveraging proven approaches, Alberta can deliver robust privacy protections without stifling innovation or burdening businesses — ensuring Albertans remain confident and competitive in a rapidly evolving digital world. For example, privacy rules should not impede efforts to detect or prevent fraud, scams, money laundering, and terrorist financing as these activities protect consumers from real harm. Likewise, preventing the abuse of privacy rights to access confidential investigation files preserves organizations’ ability to detect and prevent crime.

We also recommend that Alberta harmonise private sector privacy provisions with other Canadian jurisdictions’ private sector privacy laws where it makes sense, to promote efficiencies and productivity. Given the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI), we recommend that any provisions related to automated decision‑making systems align with Quebec’s approach, which focuses on transparency in scenarios where automated decision systems replace human decision making, or alternatively include a materiality threshold. Similarly, Alberta should consider alignment of disposal request rights with Quebec’s privacy law and existing retention requirements. Lastly, we recommend that Alberta introduce an exception to consent for the process of de-identifying data, and using de‑identified data for internal research, analysis and development, and adopt all of the recommendations made by the Canadian Anonymization Network (CANON).

Recommendation: The Government of Alberta continue to align the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) to federal privacy legislation and private sector definitions and concepts as it proceeds with its privacy reform efforts. Given the importance of harmonisation and interoperability of privacy laws to consumers and businesses, we recommend harmonising Alberta’s private sector privacy provisions with other Canadian jurisdictions’ private sector privacy laws. It is also important that provincial privacy legislation support other important consumer‑based public policy objectives, such as Consumer‑Driven Banking and efforts to combat financial crimes (including protecting confidentiality of files under investigation and supporting information sharing for financial crime prevention).

Recommendation 3: Make financial regulation more efficient and consistent across Canada

Canadians continue to adopt new payment methods offered by non‑traditional payment service providers (PSPs), including Big Tech. However, these PSPs are largely un- or under-regulated. Moreover, new payment forms such as stablecoins are emerging with a new draft legislative framework at the federal level.

Globally, G20 member countries and the OECD have recognized the risks associated with entities that engage in bank‑like activities without bank‑like regulation. Failure to address the risks associated with these entities could create stability concerns and erode trust in the financial system. Financial services and products raise public policy issues that must be addressed by governments.

As an example, while the Retail Payment Activities Act establishes a federal framework for PSPs to address certain financial and security risks, it does not impose the full range of protections for consumers that would be applied to banks and, in particular, is silent on market conduct. Given the Bank of Canada’s recent mandated oversight of nearly 3,000 PSPs, consumer usage is likely to increase and the absence of market conduct regulation is a significant gap in ensuring fair outcomes and protection for Canadians.17

Albertans should benefit from a secure, reliable, and consistent financial system regardless of the nature of the financial payments provider or geographical residence. Therefore, it is important that un- or under‑regulated players do not introduce risk into the financial system. The financial services regulatory framework, including market conduct, should adopt the principle of "same activity, same risk, same regulation" and should continue to evolve to reflect changes in technology.

Recommendation: Support the creation of a national financial regulation framework for un- or under‑regulated payments service providers (such as e-commerce platforms and similar entities) rooted in the strong system that presently governs banks. We further encourage the Government of Alberta to work with the federal and other provincial governments to establish a nationwide market conduct framework that provides consistent protections to all Canadians regardless of location.

Recommendation 4: A need for a coordinated approach to combat financial crimes

Financial crimes, such as scams, identity theft, and account takeovers, continue to threaten Canadians, with some schemes being linked to organized criminal networks beyond Canada’s borders. Reported fraud incidents have doubled over the past decade and cost Canadians more than $645 million in 2024 alone. Given that financial crimes are significantly underreported, total annual losses are estimated to exceed $12 billion.18 In Alberta alone, based on 4,200 reports, financial crimes resulted in reported losses over $55 million but actual losses are expected to be multiples of reported losses due to underreporting by victims.19

In response, the CBA is collaborating with some 50 organizations across public and private sectors (government regulators, financial institutions, telecommunications companies, law enforcement and digital platforms) in a Canadian Anti-Scam Coalition (CASC). CASC is dedicated to protecting Canadians through coordinated education, awareness, and prevention initiatives that address scams in all their forms. And, while prevention and education are essential, effective enforcement and prosecution are equally critical to ensure criminals are held accountable under the Criminal Code of Canada, preventing further victimization.

Protecting Canadians against financial crimes requires a coordinated and proactive strategy that spans the fraud lifecycle, from prevention and detection to enforcement and prosecution. This is why we support the federal government’s Budget 2025 announcement of the government’s intention to develop a whole‑of‑government National Anti‑Fraud Strategy. This strategy aligns well to the work of the CASC and should bring together financial institutions, technology, and telecommunication companies to develop a cross‑sectoral approach to protect Canadians from evolving and highly complex fraud schemes. An effective National Anti-Fraud Strategy should integrate public‑private collaboration, reinforce enforcement and prosecution capacity, and empower Albertans through education.

Recommendation: Ensure the National Anti‑Fraud strategy addresses key requirements to combat financial crimes provincially and federally, including adequate resources to hold criminals accountable under the Criminal Code of Canada. Specifically, the CBA supports the following measures:

  • Centralizing financial crimes reporting flows between the Canadian Anti‑Fraud Centre (CAFC) and Alberta police agencies to better provide line of sight to authorities to track and mitigate these crimes
  • Ensuring sufficient training, funding, and dedicated resources for law enforcement and prosecutors to respond to the rising volume and sophistication of financial crime
  • Expanding public education initiatives to equip Canadians with the knowledge and tools they need to protect themselves against financial crime and scams
  • Taking a multi‑sector approach to combatting scams, including coordinating with telecommunications and online platforms
  • Replicating successful models such as Ontario's Serious Fraud Office in Alberta to improve coordination and enforcement

Recommendation 5: Need for a harmonised anti‑money laundering and anti‑terrorist financing regime

The Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA) must continue to serve as the cornerstone in Canada’s fight against money laundering (ML) and terrorist financing (TF). While the CBA may support certain changes to the PCMLTFA, we caution against introducing new provincial requirements, reporting or otherwise, on federally regulated entities. Any fragmentation of the national regime could inadvertently:

  • Empower bad actors by creating pockets of legislative arbitrage if federal and provincial requirements are misaligned
  • Undermine the federal government’s ongoing and important national policy efforts
  • Complicate coordination among expanding set of authorities as ML and TF risks evolve, and
  • Potentially exacerbate concerns with high‑volume, low impact reporting

Rather than adding new layers of regulations to an already comprehensive federal framework, the CBA urges the Government of Alberta to support existing anti-money laundering (AML)/anti‑terrorist financing (ATF) tools and invest in law enforcement to strengthen the fight against ML and TF by:

  • Working with the federal government to continue to expand the transparency of beneficial ownership in Canada through a one‑stop‑shop, publicly accessible beneficial ownership registry that reflects, through aligned data points, the beneficial ownership information of corporations and other entities (e.g., partnerships, trusts, and associations) from across Canada
  • Investing in law enforcement to support its investigation and prosecution of ML and TF cases and enhance coordination with relevant federal authorities

Recommendation: Collaborate with the federal government to strengthen Canada’s commitment to corporate beneficial ownership transparency, in addition to investment in relevant authorities to support ML and TF investigations. In particular, we urge investments in Alberta’s enforcement and prosecution capacity and harmonize its existing tools with federal measures. A harmonized approach will ensure effectiveness by avoiding legislative arbitrage and reduce compliance duplication across jurisdictions.

Recommendation 6: Federal‑provincial collaboration on investment account switching

Provincial governments play an important role in ensuring Canadians benefit from a seamless, secure, and efficient investment account switching process. The federal government’s Budget 2025 initiative to prohibit fees on transfers across account types and institutions, require timely transfers of funds, and mandate clear presentation about the transfer process is also an opportunity to modernize the account transfer system.20 This includes standardizing transfer procedures, improving security, and harmonizing regulations across the entire account transfer ecosystem that extends beyond banks21 to ultimately provide a more consistent experience for investors.

Currently, regulations and procedures vary across the account transfer ecosystem, which includes financial institutions under provincial jurisdiction (e.g. investment dealers, mutual fund dealers, credit unions, trust companies, insurance companies). A lack of a coordinated and harmonized approach risks creating a fragmented, two‑tiered regulatory framework that undermines competition, confuses clients, and leads to a patchwork of transfer tools, standards and processes.

The Alberta Securities Commission (ASC) and other provincial securities regulators should coordinate with self‑regulatory organizations such as Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) and the federal government to ensure that any account transfer reforms are designed and implemented in an aligned and harmonized manner. Such collaboration would ensure that prospective regulations are implemented consistently across account types and financial institutions.

The CBA believes that such coordination should produce the following outcomes, all of which will benefit Canadians:

  1. Harmonized regulations that apply to all institutions in the account transfer ecosystem (banks, investment dealers, mutual fund dealers, credit unions, trust companies, insurance companies, etc.)
  2. An industry‑wide standard for account transfer procedures and timelines – including a defined 10‑clearing-day settlement period for account transfers (with exemptions during peak season and for complex cases) and explicit obligations for both receiving and delivering firms when impediments arise
  3. Use of automated transfer services (ATON/Fundserv/CANNEX) for eligible assets and electronic communications where available
  4. Industry‑wide adoption of a modernized and interoperable electronic/automated account transfer solution (building on ATON/Fundserv/CANNEX, etc.) that eliminates the use of manual processes (paper/fax/cheques) and incorporates strong authentication and anti‑fraud controls

Recommendation: Collaborate with the federal government by having the Alberta Securities Commission (ASC) coordinate with self-regulatory organizations such as the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) to:

  • Support harmonized regulations across all institutions offering investment and registered accounts
  • Modernize account transfer infrastructure
  • Establish standardized procedures and timelines

Recommendation 7: Enabling federal options for credit unions

In addition to more than 70 banks, three federal credit unions are currently licensed under the federal Bank Act to operate across Canada, affording them the ability to compete by scaling and making necessary investments in technology, talent, and risk management. However, most credit unions operate under provincial oversight in Alberta, 12 credit unions service more than 718,000 customers, hold over $34 billion in assets and nearly $29 billion in deposits.22 Migrating to a federal license enables credit unions to carry on business outside or to merge with (or purchase assets from) credit unions outside their home province, which enables economies of scale and diversifies risks across markets.

While policymakers acknowledge that scale enhances resilience, builds internal capacity (technical, operational, and strategic), and improves risk management, the process for federal credit union mergers of amalgamations or asset transactions with provincially regulated entities is long and cumbersome.23 Mergers involving federal and provincial credit unions require approval from the Minister of Finance, OSFI, the provincial regulator, deposit insurers, and the Competition Bureau.24 In Budget 2025, the federal government has acknowledged the need for support for federal credit unions’ growth, via amalgamation or asset acquisitions, and to make it easier for credit unions to enter the federal framework.

Most provincial legislation is silent on a credit union’s continuance under the Bank Act, an option for credit unions to operate under the national standard or amalgamate with an existing federal credit union.25 The limited number of transitions to date highlights persistent internal regulatory barriers and greater transition flexibility is needed to allow credit unions to scale and compete across provinces. Therefore, the province should ensure a smooth and efficient process for provincial credit unions to transition to the federal level as stand-alone or amalgamated entities and ensuring requirements (including approvals) be proportionate to the transaction, and provide guidance that facilitates credit unions’ continuance under the federal Bank Act following an amalgamation or asset transaction between federal and provincial credit unions.

One of the benefits of the federal regulatory framework is transparency: federally regulated institutions must publish monthly and quarterly financial disclosures that are published on the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) website. Most provincial credit unions currently post annual financial statements on their individual sites. More frequent, standardized disclosures through a centralized portal would strengthen transparency of the credit union system’s financial state, helping inform depositors and borrowers when making financial decisions. Such transparency will improve visibility and understanding of key risks, promote public confidence and stability in Alberta’s provincial credit union system.

Lastly, to ensure Canada’s financial system continues to remain one of the safest and reputable in the world, Alberta’s unlimited deposit guarantee should be re‑examined to align with national and international best practices.

Recommendation: Provide policy and regulatory support to help provincially regulated credit unions that choose to transition to the federal credit union framework as well as amalgamations and asset transactions between federal and provincial credit unions, increase financial transparency in the provincial credit union system, and align the provincial credit unions’ unlimited deposit guarantees to international and national best practices.

Recommendation 8: Strengthening public safety and community well‑being

Emerging risks to automated teller machines (ATMs) from heavy construction equipment misuse

Across Canada, ATM attacks involving construction equipment are rising sharply: from one incident in 2023 to six incidents in 2024 to ten in 2025. As of 2025, such attacks account for 28 per cent of all ATM attacks.26 This trend is highly concerning due to the scale of losses and broader impact on local businesses and communities. Beyond the direct financial impact and the costs of repair and replacement of damaged ATMs, temporary or prolonged branch closures reduce access to essential banking services. These disruptions are especially harmful in rural or underserved areas, where alternative banking options are limited.

A contributing factor to such attacks is the use of universal keys in many types of construction machinery. These keys are easily obtainable and interchangeable across brands and models, creating a substantial security vulnerability.27 Bad actors, including organized criminal networks, are becoming increasingly sophisticated, often conducting reconnaissance and likely obtaining master keys in advance. To mitigate these risks, manufacturers and contractors should adopt unique, machine‑specific access systems to ensure that only authorized personnel can operate equipment. Some heavy construction equipment is also equipped with ignition kill switches or immobilizers that require a personal identification number (PIN) for bypass. To reduce the risk of PIN compromise and subsequent circumvention of these security controls, we recommend increasing the frequency of the PIN lifecycle management, including the issuance, updating, and retirement of PINs.

Additionally, notices of approved construction site locations would enable ATM operators to apply risk‑based security measures to mitigate the opportunities of theft with heavy construction equipment. Information sharing between stakeholders, including governments, CBA and private sector stakeholders would assist in the implementation of risk‑based security measures.

Community safety challenges

Alberta’s provincial crime rate and severity remain above the national average. In 2024, the crime rate per 100,000 was almost 26 per cent higher than the national average.28 In many parts of Canada, rising crime and violence continue to affect communities, creating heightened safety concerns for commuters to workplaces, forcing businesses closures, reducing family‑supporting jobs, and growing pressures on mental health and social support programs.29

A comprehensive, cross‑jurisdictional approach is needed to address the interconnected challenges of mental health, addiction, homelessness, and public safety that impact banks and surrounding communities. Temporary measures such as removing unhoused individuals from ATM vestibules or businesses (by security guard services or law enforcement) displaces the individuals from one location to another, is not sustainable long‑term, and fail to address root causes. To that end, loitering remains a high concern for banks, accounting for approximately 60 per cent of all 2025 year‑to‑date physical security incidents in Alberta alone.30 Strengthening mental-health and addiction supports, expanding crisis‑response teams like mobile response teams (MRTs) and investing in permanent housing and economic‑stability initiatives are also essential to reducing disruptive behaviour, enhancing staff and customer safety, and supporting healthier, more resilient communities. These MRT teams consist of health care professionals working alongside specially trained police officers, help and de‑escalate volatile situations, and connect individuals to follow‑up care and community programs.

We request that the Government of Alberta provide a comprehensive listing of all mental health mobile crisis teams (MHMCTs) operating across the province. Centralizing this information would significantly reduce the administrative burden currently placed on financial institutions, which are otherwise required to compile this data independently across jurisdictions.

The CBA is active in finding solutions to these challenges across the country. For example, the CBA has contributed to the Edmonton Downtown Recovery Coalition (DRC), a collaboration between business and community leaders focused on revitalizing the Edmonton downtown area. The DRC’s efforts focus on three pillars: safety and security, cleanliness and infrastructure, and transformational projects. The public safety challenges in Edmonton are prevalent across the province, and we recommend the Government of Alberta consider launching similar coalitions to energize and stimulate local communities across the province.

Recommendation: Strengthen public safety and community well‑being by:

  • Introducing legislation or industry regulations to phase out the use of universal master keys in heavy construction equipment and implementing a regular PIN management regiment
  • Facilitating information sharing of construction site locations with various stakeholders to allow ATM operators to implement risk-based security measures
  • Implementing innovative and comprehensive solutions that address public safety challenges, while improving community vitality and economic growth
  • Urgently increasing funding for community vibrancy projects, addiction recovery services, and expanded Police and Crisis Teams
  • Enhancing community services for unhoused individuals, recognizing that this continues to be a significant challenge
  • Launching local coalition efforts to revitalize heavily impacted cities and regions
  • Providing a comprehensive listing of all mobile response teams (MRTs) operating across the province

Conclusion

The CBA appreciates the opportunity to contribute to the province’s upcoming Budget. Our recommendations are designed to help shape Canada’s, and Alberta’s, future by fostering investment and innovation, strengthening communities across the province, and enhancing the resilience of our country’s economy. Critically, we seek to ensure that Albertans, indeed all Canadians, have the opportunity to thrive. We welcome the opportunity to discuss our recommendations in greater detail and to explore efforts to collaboratively deliver benefits for Albertans.


1 2024 banking contributions provided by CBA, workforce composition based on 2023 data, Statscan.
2 Mortgage lending statistics provided by Bank of Canada
3 Lending statistics provided by CBA
4 ISED, Credit Conditions Survey, 2010 to 2024.
5 Canadian Credit Union Association (CCUA), Third Quarter 2024 National Sector Results, Revised January 2025
6 CBA data, Credit Union Deposit Guarantee Corporation Alberta’s Annual Report 2024, ATB Financial 2025 Annual Report
7 CMHC National Housing Act Approved Lenders.
8 Tracxn, as of October 8, 2025
9 Calculated from Payments Canada, Payment Methods and Trends Report 2024. Includes debit card, credit card and prepaid card, by value.
10 Calculated by CBA.
11 CBA calculations and Bennett Jones, Economic Outlook 2025, Safeguarding a Vital Relationship and Investing in a More Productive Economy. While the Finance and Insurance produced $93 in real GDP per hour worked, banking and other depository credit intermediation produced $113.40 in real GDP per hour worked.
12 Conference Board of Canada, Funding the Future: The Economic Impact of Canada’s Investment Funds Industry, September 2024, Blended MER including ETF calculated using market share data on p. 5.
13 OECD, OECD Compendium of productivity indicators 2023, February 2023.
14 RBC Thought Leadership, Canada’s growth challenge: Why the economy is stuck in neutral, June 2024.
15 OECD, Corporate income tax statutory and targeted small business rates, Combined (corporate and shareholder) statutory tax rates on dividend income, 2024 and Effective tax rates, 2023. (OECD Data Explorer)
16 Australian Government Productivity Commission, Towards Levyathan? Industry levies in Australia Research paper, December 2023.
17 Bank of Canada, Laying bare the evolution of payments in Canada, May 2024
18 Competition Bureau of Canada, Fraud Prevention Month to focus on impersonation fraud, one of the fastest growing forms of fraud, February 2025
19 CAFC 2024 Annual Statistical Report
20 Budget 2025, p. 117.
21 Includes investment dealers, mutual fund dealers, credit unions, trust companies, insurance companies, etc.
22 Credit Union Deposit Guarantee Corporation Alberta, Annual Report 2024, December 2024
23 BCFSA, Cooperative Finance at a crossroads: Strengthening system design for what’s ahead, July 2025
24 CCUA, Stronger Together, Sooner: A Roadmap for Faster and Fairer Credit Union Merger, Reviews, August 2025
25 25Currently, Alberta and New Brunswick have legislation that explicitly contemplates the amalgamation of a provincially regulated credit union with a federally regulated credit union under federal continuance
26 Figures are provided for a calendar year, January to December. 2025 YTD includes figures from January to October
27 CBC, Easy to get heavy equipment keys, says operator after back‑to‑back robberies, January 2019
28 Statistics Canada, Incident-based crime statistics, by detailed violations, Canada, provinces, territories, Census Metropolitan Areas and Canadian Forces Military Police, September 2025.
29 Saskatoon credit union branch to close due to 'increased threat' to safety, CTV News Saskatoon, November 2023.
30 2025 year-to-date figures encompasses incidents occurring in quarters one through three


Related Articles